EDA Library Development by Dedicated Teams
Maximizing Efficiency in Electronics Design
In the fast-paced world of electronic design, efficiency and innovation are paramount. As technical leaders, it’s crucial to optimize resources and empower electronics design teams to focus on what specialists do best. Yet, there’s a common pitfall that often saps valuable time and resources from engineering talent: the development of an EDA library (stands for Electronics Design Automation), including schematic symbols and PCB footprints. Here, we suggest five compelling reasons why electronic design engineers should not be burdened with this task:
- Misalignment with Core Responsibilities: Developing EDA libraries should not be the primary function of electronic design engineers. Their expertise lies in conceptualizing, designing, and troubleshooting electronic systems. Asking hardware engineers to divert their attention to library development detracts from their core responsibilities and hampers productivity.
- Personnel Shortage Concerns: In the current competitive labour landscape, the demand for skilled electrical engineers far outweighs the available talent pool. It’s a disservice to a specific engineering team and the industry at large to allocate scarce engineering resources to tasks that could be handled more efficiently elsewhere.
- Lack of Established Processes: Without a standardized workflow for EDA library development, engineers often find themselves reinventing the wheel, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistencies. This lack of structured methodology not only consumes valuable time but also increases the risk of errors and oversights in the final product.
- Outdated Standards Adherence: The field of electronic design is constantly evolving, with new technologies and standards emerging at a rapid pace. Engineers who are preoccupied with library development may struggle to stay abreast of the latest industry standards and best practices, potentially compromising the quality and compatibility of their designs.
- Compromised Quality: Rushed or half-hearted attempts at library creation due to time constraints can result in subpar quality and reliability. Every component in an EDA library must undergo meticulous scrutiny and validation to ensure its accuracy and functionality. Hardware engineers, less focused on the seemingly less important and less complicated activity of component creation, simply cannot devote the necessary time and attention to uphold these standards.
To optimize a team’s effectiveness and drive innovation, it’s crucial to recognize the value of specialized expertise in EDA library development. By leveraging dedicated resources and outsourcing non-core activities, an effective R&D manager can focus electronics design engineers on their core competencies, leading to superior designs, faster time-to-market, and a greater competitive advantage.
By choosing to outsource these specialized tasks, product companies can significantly enhance their efficiency, quality of output, and competitive edge in the market. It’s a non-brainer decision towards optimizing your team’s potential and catalyzing the next wave of electronic innovation.
Interested? Your Next Steps
Learn more about ECAD Library Development service of Sintecs or Contact us.
